Take A Look Here

Showing posts with label Perspective. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Perspective. Show all posts

Thursday, June 16, 2011

How To Select A Good Brand Name [From Trademark Perspective]?

Trademarks are the names and logos used by business entities or individuals for business. Registration of trademark is necessary to protect the goodwill and reputation of one’s business from competitors. Selecting a strong trademark is very important as it distinguishes the mark from other available marks in the trade. Use of a word that is commonly required by other traders is to be avoided as the idea behind using a trademark is to distinguish one’s own products from those of others. In order to register a trademark it should be “capable of distinguishing” the trademarked goods or services from those of other traders. A trademark should be appealing and have an agreeable image or connotation

Trying to market a poor trademark which is similar to another registered mark may entangle you in legal disputes Therefore, before registration of a trademark it is essential to know the marks which are prohibited under the trademark law.

What can be registered?

Surnames, proper names and words describing goods and services can be registered as a trademark. For example Birla Corporation Limited uses their surname Birla as their trademark. A trademark can be registered if it is able to distinguish its product in the market and it is not used to deceive or confuse the customer.

What cannot be registered?

Registration of the following marks is prohibited under the trademark law: Trademarks Devoid of distinctive character: A mark which do not distinguish the goods and services from others or which describes the nature and quality of goods and services or has become customary in respect of the relevant goods or services cannot be registered. For example, Otis’s trademark “Escalator” for moving staircases became a generic word and therefore, the Trademark Office concluded that Otis cannot use its trademark since the mark has become customary in respect of moving stairs.Marks that Deceive or confuse the customer: A mark which is an imitation of a well known trademark for same or similar goods and can deceive consumers cannot be registered as a trademark. For example- Using a mark “Colmate” with similar get up of “Colgate” for toothpaste would not be registered as a trademark.Scandalous marks: Marks that can hurt religious sentiments or contains obscene matter cannot be registered. For example, the mark “Hallelujah” for clothing was not given registration.Prohibited marks: A mark where the application for registration is in bad faith; or seal/flag of the Republic or of other countries, or a mark which is prohibited under law cannot be registered. For example- National flag of a country.Shape of goods: If the shape of the good results in nature of the goods or gives technical results and substantial value, such a mark cannot be registered. This is because it would limit the development of industries which manufacture it. For example- shape of Vienetta ice cream that resulted from the nature of the product itself was held not registrable.Earlier trademark: Any mark which is similar to an earlier trade mark in identity and similarity in goods and services cannot be registered. For example- another “Kodak” for camera or “Fair and lovely” for cosmetics would not be registered as a trademark.Geographical Names: Geographical names cannot be used when a particular place is famous for a particular good/ service. For example, “Nilgiris” cannot be used for tea since Nilgiri is famous for its tea. However, if there is no connection between a particular place and product, it can still be registered, for example “North Pole” for ice-creams can be registered, since North Pole is not connected to ice-creams in any way.

These simple rules should be kept in mind while selecting a good trade name. Keeping these rules in mind, one can select a strong trademark which would be distinctive and would be legally enforceable as well as easily registrable.

[Guest article by Pankhi Dutta, IP Analyst at Intepat IP Services Pvt Ltd, Bangalore.]

Recommended Read:


View the original article here

Comparison of Compensation Structure For Startup Employees [An Employee's Perspective]

Over the past few years I have worked with different startups and all with different compensation structures. Here’s a teardown of those structures from an employee’s perspective, based on my and few friends/colleagues experiences. This will help you decide a compensation structure that will work best for a long term employee.

1. Standard Stipend – Of the few college students who get a decent internship during the 4 years, most have little knowledge of the field they are supposed to deliver in. The startup takes a big risk in terms of management time by hiring an intern; as most students do not deliver production level stuff. If an intern ends up contributing something to the startup, no matter what stipend you give him chances are that he will think it is unjustified. Don’t dodge from your initial budget, the contract here was not about money but about making him do and learn. All you need to take care of is to be good to him, give ears to him, challenge him, and laugh with him. If you did all this right, the good interns will always stick around and come back to you. The ones that left for a higher paying job are not the ones you’d need or not the ones you deserve.

2. Below Standard Fixed Cash – If you are paying him a small fixed salary, much lower than what his counter parts are getting then you can never expect him to stick around. Hunger to learn and much needed working experience is all good motivation but at the end of the day that tickles only 1 half of the brain. The rest 50% is driven by materialistic compensation.
I have seen a lot of small software services firms do this and name it as training. The end result is a very unstable organisation. People are always looking out for a decent option. There is no one that has grown with the organisation.

3. Standard Fixed Cash – A fixed component only, is underestimating the potential of the employee. Having only fixed cash discourages workplace innovation. In start-ups specially where even the smallest feature change could turn around a stuff, it’s important to welcome ideas from all end, starting from your employees. Seeing his idea being implemented will definitely motivate the employee and is enough for the first time but from next time onwards he would know the value of his contribution and would want a “reward” for that. Even for the low-skilled employees, the reward is important.

4. Standard Fixed cash + Variable cash – The variable cash is a good motivator but the metrics you define for that is most important. In startups initial business plan and key metrics change every month. What looks like the employee’s key focus area may not even be part of your business in next few weeks. In such cases it is tiring and often an uncomfortable aspect to keep re-defining metrics for the variable cash. Also, the day the target is met, that guy is going to leave you because there is no “stickiness” component. Hard metrics based cash component is for freelancers and external agencies, not for employees.
This kind of compensation may work for sales guys who do transactional one time sales but contribute little to the product.
Product metrics is important to manage the product, not to manage the employee’s compensation.

5. Standard Fixed Cash + Variable Cash + Stocks – A stock option with a decent vesting period (3-4 yrs) is the best form of materialistic motivator. For a founder it makes sure that the employee will stick around for long enough. For the employee it assures a share in the pie. The stocks are required over and above the standard fixed cash because this element will make him slog the extra hours that his counterparts in large companies don’t.
Large cash bonuses mean a liability on your books and even if the employee is performing good, cash may not be flowing well to justify his contribution.

Suggestion – What works best?

1. Standard Fixed component – Nothing less than what someone with his kind of tag would get at a large company. By tag I mean only the education / domain / yrs. of exp. Do not account his quality of work here. If his work quality is not good, fire him; never keep an underpaid or underskilled employee.

2. Justified stocks with long term vesting – This is the component that will make him stick around. There will be times when he would be getting good offers from all over or an itch to start on his own or may be he is just pissed off and is about to take an impulsive decision to leave you; the stocks options will make him think twice.

3. Small bonus Stocks / Cash – A non fixed component is very important to keep the good guys on their toes. Instead of making it quarterly target driven, make it annual, open for a subjective discussion and based on cross employee review. Let the employee decide whether he wants cash or stocks. It’s good to define an upper cap beforehand incase of cash, for the sake of avoiding liability in your books but still keep it open ended. If he is really very good, let him have the very good share of the pie.

The point in stock option is that it clearly justifies startup’s success, “We will make it if we are together in this for long enough. No matter what we end up making, everyone will have their piece in the pie.”

What do you think? What has worked best for you?

PS: I haven’t discussed these thoughts ever earlier, please be polite in the comments. Avoid personal attacks/questions and discuss the subject.

pic credit



View the original article here